Minor Parties

pertain of Minor Parties In this paper, I will be discussing the involve of child parties. Minor parties atomic number 18 semipolitical parties who ache little to no impact on elections due to the bill of jocks and/or money is put into the political party. However, in the United States, tyke parties sometimes gift a huge impact on governing and elections, whether its clean getting their word out there and the study parties truly listen and discuss their issues, or they can even change which major party wins the election. Whatever the case may be, it shows that minor parties atomic number 18 just as effective as the major parties, although they have never scrape up out on top.Just because they are minor, does not mean they have no say or no impact in g overnment. They are just as important as the major parties, and they should always be interpreted into consideration during election time. In my opinion, I think minor parties are great for this country. They brin g in different views and ideas, and I like to understand what some of them have to say. The United States is a free country, and in the prototypic amendment of the Constitution, it allows us the right of free speech. This means anyone can express their thoughts and views on just about anything, and the minor parties do just that.They have gotten a say in politics, and the major parties sometimes bring the minor parties issues into tidings because they agree that their issue is a serious problem, and it needs to be fixed. I think its in force(p) that we dont always have to hear the same boring stuff about issues we already go to sleep about. level off though they may never win a presidential election, at least there is some party out there that understands the issues that the major parties nor the majority of the United States citizens never really thought about.There has been a long history of minor party outlooks running for president, starting with the Anti-Masonic societ y led by William Whit in 1832, and ending with the Reformist ships company led by Ross Perot in 1996. There have even been rattling successful minor parties. Some examples are Theodore Roosevelts Bull wapiti party in 1912, John Breckenridges Southern Democrat Party in 1860, and the most successful and recent one of our time Ross Perots Independent Party in 1992. All of these parties I mentioned made an impact on their respected elections, and because of them, they brought in new ideas and have shaped our authoritative disposal.In this paragraph, I am going to discuss the 1992 election, and how a minor party greatly effected this election. In 1992, the Independent Party led by Ross Perot was running up against George W. Bush older of the Republican Party and charge Clinton of the Democratic Party. Perot was a member of the Republican Party prior to the election, entirely because of his disagreements with both of the parties issues, he decided to run as an independent. Bush S r. was the current President, and was a shoe in for this election, provided because of Perots switching of parties and how vocal he was, Bush lost supporters, while Perot gained a lot.Because of this, Clinton win with alone 43% of the popular vote, while Bush had about 37%, and Perot had about 20%. This was one of the only times a President was elected into office without the majority vote. This became the turning point on how the pot viewed minor parties, and ever since, the government has started to listen to their views to a greater extent often. There are even two independents in the Senate right now, taking the impact of minor parties another step further. With these minor parties there are supporters of them and there are people who are against them.The supporters of minor parties in the United States are apparently the minor parties themselves and the people who support them because they want a say in politics so the current government can discuss them, and possibly ch ange things around a little to their benefit if necessary. Another supporter would be the major party who got into office in an election because of the minor parties because if it werent for the minor parties and their popularity at the time, the major partys candidate may have not gotten into office.The people who oppose them would probably be the major parties who lose an election due to the minor parties because the minor parties screwed them over from winning a presidential election. For example, the Republican Party was more than likely very angry at Perot for not only leaving their party, but also costing them the 1992 election. The Democrats were obviously very happy because if it werent for Perot, Clinton would have never been President that year. In conclusion, minor parties are great for our country. Even though they never win, they still have an impact on politics and sometimes the elections.The only alternative I would suggest would be for the major parties to listen mo re to the minor parties because as of right now, nothing good is being done for this country to be turned around. There is a great deal of partisanship in the government right now, and no one is willing to work with one another because they are only concerned with their views and their partys views, without taking others views into consideration. A minor party may have a good idea that both parties like, and it may be able to bring some bipartisanship back in the government and even help our economy a little bit.There is nothing scathe with minor parties in this country, and I hope the major parties listen to more of their ideas in the future. Works Cited Leip, David. 1992 Presidential General Election Results. US excerption Atlas. N. p. , n. d. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. Lightman, Max. The Role of Minor Parties in Politics. Slideshare. N. p. , 30 Apr. 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. Salka, William M. The Impact of Minor Parties on Electoral Competition An Examination of US. N. p. , n. d. Web . 18 Mar. 2013.