National Debt :: Argumentative Economics Economy Papers

National Debt I agree with what was said above. The debt although large pull up stakes never need to be paid off. Cutting off social services in the government is not and will not put to work the problem it will only prolong it. The social government ending that went in effect at 1200a.m. monday night does not turn a thing. It only cuts what some people desperately need to servive. genuine this will save our government some money, but not rise enough to erase the debt. Mr. Clinton came into office wanting to make health aid affordable for all. Mrs. Clinton made a name for herself trying to get her health care plans passed. Now they turn around and pull this shutdown. I stimulate the shutdown is not all his falt, but he is the President and he should get negotiations moving in a positive direction. Our government needs to start comprimising both sides of the proposals. Democratic and Republican ideas need to be combine in order to get something passed tha t will work. If the government is so concerned with the home(a) debt then they need to work something out instead of just force the problem out with the parshall govt shutdown. My proposal to some of the national debt is to start sell some of the items in our stock houses. I once saw 60 minutes do a piece on the stock houses. It amaze me on how many items we have in surplus. You see, the govt buys articles off of businesses when they need them during a war time production. After the war is over though, the govt continues to purchase the aforesaid(prenominal) amount of goods even though we dont need them. This allows the business who sells the product to find their head above water and profit a little which in turn allows the workers to have more money and purchase more goods. This is proficient of our govt to do this, but the surplus items should be used or sell to Americas