Critical Thinking Part 4 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Critical Thinking Part 4 - Assignment prototypeThe authors clearly and openly recognize the subjects of the research, but have failed to indicate whether their homosexual Rights were protected. However, I feel that the subjects Human Rights were protected to prevent them against any exploitation or discrimination. Yes, the authors have acknowledged that they were given the permission to learn out this study which was approved by local university and hospital moral re positioning committees. Also, the authors obtained informed agree from all the participants (Wilkins & Woodgate 458).In interpretive account, participants conscription focused on persons having the knowledge under study. In view of that, the insertion standards were as follows cancer survivors who were out primary cancer diagnosis for 5 or more than years, 19 years of age at the time of interview, taking residency in the region where the interviews were to be conducted, and fluent speakers of English. Research parti cipants were conscripted from hospital based catalog and regional cancer registry. The regional cancer registry was consulted to exclude persons with malignant tumor diagnosis, second cancer diagnosis, amid others. Although the authors tell us that the participants were recruited, they have not indicated that the subjects current any money.There was no unseemly conflict of interest during recruitment. Most of the participants were from the vulnerable cancer survivors. Ideally, later one is diagnosed with cancer, the danger of developing a second cancer is an ingredient of day after day life. All the research subjects accounted that they had the full knowledge of their second cancer. Second cancer was expressed in equipment casualty of probable danger features for cancer, providing detailed information to the cancer survivors with a view to preparing them to conceptualize the theoretical temper of danger. This information forms the bulk of the argument that the subjects came from the vulnerable population (Wilks &