Motivational Theories

sevensome batch were chosen who were musical theme to be representatives of a assorted work force. The data was compiled provided by the Work Motivation cogitation found on the University of capital of Arizona resource page to see what the individual strengths and weaknesses were of the team. Next, four motivational theories were chosen that were believed to be the beat out motivators to help the team with the changes caused by the merger/acquisition. The take aim of this paper is to assess the impact of the data that was gathered on employee job satisfaction and motivation.\n\n nature Profiles\nIndividual #1\nteam member #1 is mannish and has worked with the companionship over 10 historic period as a professional. He is highly make by completing toilsome challenges. He has a absolute need to be desire by others and enjoys building terminal relationships with his co-workers. However, he would much kind of work by himself. He is not motivated by setting and achievin g goals and is only middling competitive. He does not cull an authoritative role and enjoys feedback on his work carry on.\n\nIndividual #2\nteam member #2 is a male who has worked with the company less than two eld in production/assembly. He is not motivated to remedy his work performance and prefers circumstantial or no competition. He has problems focusing on the line at hand because of enculturation with fellow co-workers. He desires no position of authority and does not fate difficult challenges. He is highly confrontational alone likes to work in a team setting. He doesnt like to be important or belong to throng organizations. He likes to know the progress of his work.\n\nIndividual #3\nTeam member #3 is a female who has worked for the company for 3-5 years in an administrative role. She tries to advance her performance but is scare by competition. She is very people oriented and gets distracted considerably talking with co-workers. She doesnt want to be in regi ster nor does she want very thought-provoking tasks. ...